🔗 Share this article

Around the globe, nations are investing massive amounts into the concept of “sovereign AI” – building domestic AI models. From the city-state of Singapore to Malaysia and the Swiss Confederation, states are vying to create AI that grasps local languages and cultural nuances.

The Worldwide AI Battle

This trend is a component of a larger global contest led by major corporations from the America and China. Whereas organizations like OpenAI and a social media giant pour enormous funds, middle powers are also taking their own bets in the artificial intelligence domain.

Yet with such huge amounts involved, is it possible for less wealthy states secure notable benefits? As noted by an expert from an influential policy organization, Except if you’re a rich government or a big company, it’s quite a challenge to create an LLM from nothing.”

National Security Concerns

Many countries are reluctant to rely on overseas AI systems. Throughout the Indian subcontinent, for instance, US-built AI systems have at times fallen short. An illustrative case featured an AI tool deployed to educate students in a isolated village – it communicated in English with a thick Western inflection that was nearly-incomprehensible for regional users.

Furthermore there’s the state security dimension. For the Indian military authorities, relying on certain foreign AI tools is viewed inadmissible. As one founder commented, “It could have some random training dataset that may state that, oh, Ladakh is outside of India … Utilizing that specific AI in a military context is a major risk.”

He further stated, “I have spoken to people who are in the military. They want to use AI, but, forget about specific systems, they don’t even want to rely on Western systems because data could travel overseas, and that is completely unacceptable with them.”

National Initiatives

Consequently, some nations are backing local projects. One this initiative is being developed in India, wherein a company is striving to develop a domestic LLM with government backing. This initiative has allocated roughly $1.25bn to AI development.

The founder foresees a model that is significantly smaller than top-tier systems from Western and Eastern tech companies. He notes that India will have to make up for the financial disparity with skill. Based in India, we do not possess the advantage of investing billions of dollars into it,” he says. “How do we vie versus say the hundreds of billions that the US is devoting? I think that is where the fundamental knowledge and the brain game comes in.”

Regional Priority

Throughout the city-state, a state-backed program is backing AI systems trained in local local dialects. These languages – for example Malay, the Thai language, the Lao language, Bahasa Indonesia, the Khmer language and more – are commonly inadequately covered in American and Asian LLMs.

It is my desire that the individuals who are building these independent AI models were informed of just how far and the speed at which the frontier is moving.

A leader participating in the program explains that these models are created to supplement more extensive AI, instead of displacing them. Platforms such as a popular AI tool and Gemini, he says, often find it challenging to handle regional languages and local customs – speaking in unnatural Khmer, for example, or proposing meat-containing dishes to Malaysian users.

Creating native-tongue LLMs enables state agencies to code in cultural nuance – and at least be “informed users” of a powerful tool developed elsewhere.

He adds, I am cautious with the concept sovereign. I think what we’re trying to say is we want to be more accurately reflected and we want to understand the features” of AI systems.

Multinational Cooperation

For states seeking to carve out a role in an escalating global market, there’s a different approach: join forces. Experts connected to a respected policy school recently proposed a state-owned AI venture distributed among a group of emerging nations.

They refer to the project “Airbus for AI”, modeled after Europe’s successful strategy to develop a competitor to a major aerospace firm in the mid-20th century. The plan would see the creation of a government-supported AI organization that would merge the assets of various states’ AI projects – including the UK, Spain, the Canadian government, the Federal Republic of Germany, the nation of Japan, the Republic of Singapore, South Korea, France, Switzerland and the Kingdom of Sweden – to develop a viable alternative to the US and Chinese leaders.

The lead author of a paper describing the initiative says that the idea has gained the attention of AI leaders of at least three countries so far, in addition to multiple national AI organizations. Although it is now targeting “middle powers”, emerging economies – Mongolia and Rwanda among them – have also shown curiosity.

He elaborates, Currently, I think it’s an accepted truth there’s less trust in the promises of the existing US administration. Experts are questioning like, can I still depend on such systems? What if they decide to