🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's lawmakers have decided to pull out from an global treaty created to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following extensive and intense debates in the parliament.

Several thousand of demonstrators assembled in the capital this past week to oppose the decision. The ultimate decision now lies with Head of State Edgars Rinkevics, who must determine whether to endorse or reject the legislation.

Known as the Istanbul Convention, the international accord only took effect in Latvia last twelve months ago, requiring governments to develop legal frameworks and assistance programs to eliminate all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to begin the procedure of withdrawing from the treaty. Turkey pulled out in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations characterized as a significant setback for women's rights.

Political Debate and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet traditionalist groups have contended that its emphasis on gender equality weakens traditional families and advances what they term "non-traditional gender concepts".

Following a lengthy discussion in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a action sponsored by opposition parties but backed by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative government leader the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside parliament earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will continue fighting so that abuse will not prevail," she stated to the crowd.

Ideological Divisions and Reactions

One of the main political groups advocating for the exit is a nationalist party, whose head has called on the public to select from what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with various gender identities".

The nation's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the agreement not to be made political, while the organization Equality Now stated it was "not a threat to Latvian values, it was an instrument to achieve them".

The recent decision has provoked broad protest both inside Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian petition demanding the convention to be preserved. The gender equality group Centrs Marta has announced a protest for next Thursday, accusing MPs of ignoring the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Possible Next Steps

The head of the European organization's legislative body commented that the Baltic state had made a rash decision fueled by misinformation. He characterized it as an "never-before-seen and extremely worrying step backward for female equality and human rights in the continent".

He noted that since Turkey abandoned the convention four years ago, cases of gender-based killings and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the bill for additional review if he has concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on social media that he would evaluate the decision according to legal principles, "taking into account state and legal factors, instead of ideological or political perspectives".

Last week, another member of the ruling coalition, the Progressives, suggested it would not rule out petitioning to the Constitutional Court.

"This vote represents a worrisome situation for gender equality not only in Latvia but across the continent," commented a rights advocate.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been increasing in multiple EU countries
• The Istanbul Convention mandates particular safeguards for victims of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could affect similar debates in additional member states