🔗 Share this article

Sunday 30 January 1972 is remembered as among the most fatal – and consequential – days during three decades of violence in Northern Ireland.

Within the community of the incident – the legacy of Bloody Sunday are visible on the walls and embedded in people's minds.

A protest demonstration was organized on a wintry, sunny afternoon in Londonderry.

The protest was opposing the practice of detention without trial – detaining individuals without trial – which had been put in place after three years of violence.

Soldiers from the elite army unit shot dead 13 people in the neighborhood – which was, and remains, a predominantly republican population.

A particular photograph became particularly prominent.

Photographs showed a Catholic priest, Fr Edward Daly, waving a bloodied fabric while attempting to shield a assembly moving a teenager, the injured teenager, who had been killed.

Journalists captured much footage on the day.

Documented accounts includes Father Daly telling a journalist that troops "appeared to discharge weapons randomly" and he was "absolutely certain" that there was no reason for the gunfire.

This account of what happened was rejected by the first inquiry.

The first investigation determined the military had been fired upon initially.

Throughout the resolution efforts, the administration set up a new investigation, after campaigning by bereaved relatives, who said the initial inquiry had been a inadequate investigation.

In 2010, the conclusion by the investigation said that overall, the soldiers had initiated shooting and that none of the casualties had presented danger.

At that time head of state, the leader, apologised in the Parliament – saying deaths were "improper and unjustifiable."

Authorities started to look into the matter.

A military veteran, known as the accused, was charged for homicide.

Accusations were made concerning the fatalities of James Wray, twenty-two, and in his mid-twenties William McKinney.

Soldier F was also accused of attempting to murder Patrick O'Donnell, additional persons, further individuals, another person, and an unidentified individual.

Exists a legal order maintaining the defendant's identity protection, which his legal team have claimed is necessary because he is at threat.

He testified the examination that he had solely shot at people who were possessing firearms.

This assertion was disputed in the final report.

Information from the investigation was unable to be used directly as testimony in the court case.

In the dock, the accused was shielded from sight with a privacy screen.

He made statements for the initial occasion in the proceedings at a proceeding in December 2024, to answer "not guilty" when the accusations were presented.

Family members of the deceased on that day made the trip from the city to the courthouse daily of the proceedings.

John Kelly, whose sibling was fatally wounded, said they always knew that attending the proceedings would be painful.

"I visualize the events in my memory," John said, as we visited the key areas referenced in the trial – from Rossville Street, where the victim was fatally wounded, to the adjacent Glenfada Park, where one victim and William McKinney were fatally wounded.

"It even takes me back to my location that day.

"I assisted with my brother and put him in the medical transport.

"I relived every moment during the evidence.

"But even with enduring all that – it's still worthwhile for me."